HomeWorkTalksFavoritesContact
Back

Jimdo

Getting Solopreneurs to Invoice

In a 50/50 test, my editor redesign raised the share of visits that start an invoice from 74% to 85%

07.2026 / 11.2026 · Product Design

The redesigned JimdoPay invoice editor: who the invoice is for first, then each line item in its own card, with a live preview of the invoice on the right.

In short

Started an invoice

85%

of editor visits

▲from 74%

A/B test, early result

Issued and sent at once

28%

of editor visits

▲from 9%

A/B test, early result

A/B test, early result: 50/50 split by seller, 28 Oct to 2 Nov 2026, 132 sellers.

  1. JimdoPay shipped in May. By summer it worked, and almost nobody used invoices.
  2. Research showed we were pitching the wrong benefit. I moved the message into screens sellers already open and rebuilt the invoice editor around the person you bill.
  3. In a 50/50 test, more visits started an invoice and three times as many issued and sent it at once. It's an early result.

We sold the wrong thing

Our Q4 2026 key results needed sellers to issue invoices: 500 monthly active customers, 1% of new customers invoicing (from 0.37%) and €100k GMV through the new JimdoPay. By September, 698 of about 1,150 sellers who had finished payment setup had never issued one.

A directional survey of 101 health practitioners on Jimdo found that none used Jimdo invoices, 39% wrote theirs in Word and half didn't know Jimdo could invoice. Medina Vultur from product and I ran interviews to find out why.

ResearchThe research board: a seller's eight steps, from waiting for a transfer to getting paid without checking, with my reasoning under each step.

For them, getting paid was already solved. Bank transfer and cash cost nothing. The open problem was clean records when the tax deadline comes, and we had been pitching the invoice as a way to get paid.

RawPost-its from the board. Each one names a decision, its tradeoff and how we would measure it.

Nothing new to build

My proposal needed no new feature. It changed where and how we told the story: inside screens sellers already open, in their words, with certainty and time as the benefit. I presented it at the Berlin offsite in September 2026.

FlowStep 2: the invoice waiting in the list.

FlowStep 3: the offer to get paid online, inside the invoice.

FlowStep 5: connecting a provider, with the best fit first.

FlowStep 6: the seller sees the email their customer gets.

Four steps of the flow, built only from screens that had already shipped.

The editor, rebuilt around the person you bill

The old editor lost 1 in 4 visits before a single field changed. I reordered it around the customer: who you bill first, then what you sell, dates last. Payment terms and notes moved behind "+ Add", and usage held at 19% of visits, against 20% before.

Each line item became its own numbered card. The draft saves itself, and one live preview sits next to the form.

Before

After

Before: dates first and every section open. After: the customer first and one card per line item.
AfterOn mobile the order holds: customer and items, then dates and payment, and an option for invoices that are already paid.

Choices before the handoff

I explored three line item cards and three places for the draft status and the preview before choosing. The handoff board marks every change for engineering, with the copy for each state.

ComponentThe line item card that won: empty, filled, and with its extra fields open.
ExplorationThree places for "Draft saved" and the preview on mobile, with the pros and cons I wrote under each.
HandoffThe handoff board: before on the left, after in the middle, numbered notes for engineering on the right.

Impact

From 28 October, half the sellers got the new editor and half kept the old one, with a rule to stop the test if errors rose by 5 points or more.

Started an invoice

85%

of editor visits

▲from 74%

A/B test, early result

Issued an invoice

56%

of editor visits

▲from 52%

A/B test, early result

Issued and sent at once

28%

of editor visits

▲from 9%

A/B test, early result

Gave up

30%

of editor visits

▼from 38%

A/B test, early result

Invoices issued a month

780

in October 2026, by 337 sellers

▲from 11 in April

Before vs after

A/B test, early result: 50/50 split by seller, 28 Oct to 2 Nov 2026, 602 visits from 132 sellers. Invoices a month: Mixpanel, April to October 2026. The product was growing too, so I don't count that number as the redesign's result.

Team and role

Me, product design
Ran the research with product, wrote the proposal, designed every state of the new editor, set the test metrics and the error guardrail, and pulled the Mixpanel numbers myself.
Medina Vultur, product
Ran the adoption research with me.
Kristina Bardavelidze
Recruited the research participants.
Sabrina Schomburg
Ran the survey.
Kevin Rademan
Wired the new editor.

What I learned

Honest read

Still early

132 sellers is a small group, so the gain could still be chance. The decision is planned for 24 November 2026.

Paid is the real goal

No invoice from the test is old enough yet to show whether it gets paid on time.

Next: Issue in the spotlight

Sending tripled although the redesign left the Issue menu alone. Save still competes with Issue, the button that brings in money, so Test 2 gives Issue the spotlight. Guardrails: drafts still issued within 7 days, and no rise in save or send errors.

Back