Embedded Payments Onboarding
Payment setup completion went from 30% to 34% in October, after I moved verification inside Jimdo

The problem
Sellers clicked "Connect" and landed on the payment provider's site, in front of a long legal form that didn't say why, how long or what came next. Most of them never finished. And five places in Jimdo asked them to set up payments, each with its own story.
One way in
I merged the five entry points into one "Set up payments" flow with one order of steps. Before anyone fills in a field, the landing says what they get. Creating a paid event in Bookings leads to the same setup.
Flow
Flow
Asking only what's missing
Engineering found that setup didn't capture the currency, tax status or bank account an invoice needs, and the provider's flow had no clean place for them. I answered with two short steps, asked inside the invoice editor when the seller needs them.
Exploration
Exploration
Exploration
Raw
Raw
Raw
A landing per market
Invoicing only exists in DACH and the Netherlands, so the landing changes with the market. Creator sellers can only get paid for bookings, and sellers moving from Stripe see what stays the same.
DACH and the Netherlands: invoices included.
Rest of the EEA and the UK: payment links.
Creator: paid bookings.
Moving from Stripe: the checkout keeps working.
Result
Setup completion, October
34%
from first step to verified
from 30%, target 50%Before vs after
Volume, new JimdoPay
€5k+
in the first ~4 weeks
from €0Before vs after
With 5+ pre-filled fields
~2×
completion rate
vs fewer fieldsBefore vs after
Before vs after means the numbers moved after the change, but no A/B test isolates the design. Sources: Mixpanel, October 2026 (completion). JimdoPay team updates, 20 Oct and 3 Nov 2026 (volume and pre-filled fields).
Honest read
Four causes, no A/B yet
The lift also came from pre-filled data, new markets and bug fixes. No A/B test separates them yet.
The leak is at the front door
In October only 12% of the 7,031 sellers who saw the onboarding submitted the first step. That is the next problem.
Team and role
I owned the flow end to end: every screen on desktop and mobile, the theming of the embedded verification and the copy, reviewed with Legal. I proposed the two decisions that changed the scope: one entry point instead of five, and the country shown as a fact instead of a dropdown.
- Product Owner
- Owned the key results.
- Engineering Manager
- Owned the rollout. Adopted my read-only country proposal.
- Epic lead and four engineers
- Built the flow.
- Legal and Data
- Legal reviewed the copy. Data defined the KPIs.
